Maria de los Angeles Varela vs Maria Isabel Fraile Vela
2011 · Result 1–0 · Three Knights Opening (C46).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Maria de los Angeles Varela vs Maria Isabel Fraile Vela with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Maria de los Angeles Varela (1748)
- Black
- Maria Isabel Fraile Vela (2017)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Three Knights Opening (C46)
About this chess game
This chess game between Maria de los Angeles Varela (1748) and Maria Isabel Fraile Vela (2017) was played in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Three Knights Opening (C46). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Maria de los Angeles Varela games or Maria Isabel Fraile Vela games? This Maria de los Angeles Varela vs Maria Isabel Fraile Vela encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Three Knights Opening.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Maria de los Angeles Varela vs Maria Isabel Fraile Vela?
Maria de los Angeles Varela vs Maria Isabel Fraile Vela (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Maria de los Angeles Varela.
What opening was played in Maria de los Angeles Varela vs Maria Isabel Fraile Vela?
The game opened with the Three Knights Opening (ECO C46).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Maria de los Angeles Varela vs Maria Isabel Fraile Vela, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.