Bruno Vanini vs Oswaldo Valentin Requejo Cotrina
2012 · Result 0–1 · Ruy Lopez: Closed, Yates Variation (C91).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Bruno Vanini vs Oswaldo Valentin Requejo Cotrina with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Bruno Vanini (2008)
- Black
- Oswaldo Valentin Requejo Cotrina (2247)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Closed, Yates Variation (C91)
About this chess game
This chess game between Bruno Vanini (2008) and Oswaldo Valentin Requejo Cotrina (2247) was played in 2012 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Closed, Yates Variation (C91). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Bruno Vanini games or Oswaldo Valentin Requejo Cotrina games? This Bruno Vanini vs Oswaldo Valentin Requejo Cotrina encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Closed, Yates Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Bruno Vanini vs Oswaldo Valentin Requejo Cotrina?
Bruno Vanini vs Oswaldo Valentin Requejo Cotrina (2012) finished 0–1, a win for Oswaldo Valentin Requejo Cotrina.
What opening was played in Bruno Vanini vs Oswaldo Valentin Requejo Cotrina?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Closed, Yates Variation (ECO C91).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Bruno Vanini vs Oswaldo Valentin Requejo Cotrina, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.