Claus Vangsgaard vs Jorgen Vejby Schacht
Kort Paaske Gruppe 1 2014, 2014 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (B21).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Claus Vangsgaard vs Jorgen Vejby Schacht with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Claus Vangsgaard (1902)
- Black
- Jorgen Vejby Schacht (1803)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Kort Paaske Gruppe 1 2014
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (B21)
About this chess game
This chess game between Claus Vangsgaard (1902) and Jorgen Vejby Schacht (1803) was played at Kort Paaske Gruppe 1 2014 in 2014 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (B21). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Claus Vangsgaard games or Jorgen Vejby Schacht games? This Claus Vangsgaard vs Jorgen Vejby Schacht encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Claus Vangsgaard vs Jorgen Vejby Schacht?
Claus Vangsgaard vs Jorgen Vejby Schacht (2014) finished 0–1, a win for Jorgen Vejby Schacht.
What opening was played in Claus Vangsgaard vs Jorgen Vejby Schacht?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (ECO B21).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Claus Vangsgaard vs Jorgen Vejby Schacht, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.