Loek Van Wely vs Silvestar Ziger
Bern Open, 1993 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Loek Van Wely vs Silvestar Ziger with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Loek Van Wely (2560)
- Black
- Silvestar Ziger (2280)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Bern Open
- Year
- 1993
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94)
About this chess game
This chess game between Loek Van Wely (2560) and Silvestar Ziger (2280) was played at Bern Open in 1993 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Loek Van Wely games or Silvestar Ziger games? This Loek Van Wely vs Silvestar Ziger encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Loek Van Wely vs Silvestar Ziger?
Loek Van Wely vs Silvestar Ziger (1993) finished 1–0, a win for Loek Van Wely.
What opening was played in Loek Van Wely vs Silvestar Ziger?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (ECO E94).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Loek Van Wely vs Silvestar Ziger, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.