Elmer Van Veenendaal vs Alexander Van Beek
European Chess Club Cup | Open Boards 67-162, 2024 · Result 0–1 · East Indian Defense (A48).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Elmer Van Veenendaal vs Alexander Van Beek with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Elmer Van Veenendaal (2032)
- Black
- Alexander Van Beek (2304)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- European Chess Club Cup | Open Boards 67-162
- Year
- 2024
- Opening
- East Indian Defense (A48)
About this chess game
This chess game between Elmer Van Veenendaal (2032) and Alexander Van Beek (2304) was played at European Chess Club Cup | Open Boards 67-162 in 2024 and finished 0–1. The opening was the East Indian Defense (A48). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Elmer Van Veenendaal games or Alexander Van Beek games? This Elmer Van Veenendaal vs Alexander Van Beek encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the East Indian Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Elmer Van Veenendaal vs Alexander Van Beek?
Elmer Van Veenendaal vs Alexander Van Beek (2024) finished 0–1, a win for Alexander Van Beek.
What opening was played in Elmer Van Veenendaal vs Alexander Van Beek?
The game opened with the East Indian Defense (ECO A48).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Elmer Van Veenendaal vs Alexander Van Beek, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.