Thomas Van Veelen vs Susanna Fraser
2019 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Variation (D61).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Thomas Van Veelen vs Susanna Fraser with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Thomas Van Veelen (1998)
- Black
- Susanna Fraser (1649)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Variation (D61)
About this chess game
This chess game between Thomas Van Veelen (1998) and Susanna Fraser (1649) was played in 2019 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Variation (D61). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Thomas Van Veelen games or Susanna Fraser games? This Thomas Van Veelen vs Susanna Fraser encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Thomas Van Veelen vs Susanna Fraser?
Thomas Van Veelen vs Susanna Fraser (2019) finished 1–0, a win for Thomas Van Veelen.
What opening was played in Thomas Van Veelen vs Susanna Fraser?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Variation (ECO D61).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Thomas Van Veelen vs Susanna Fraser, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.