Lutz van Son vs Christoph Dahmen
2013 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation (B31).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Lutz van Son vs Christoph Dahmen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Lutz van Son (2133)
- Black
- Christoph Dahmen (2081)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation (B31)
About this chess game
This chess game between Lutz van Son (2133) and Christoph Dahmen (2081) was played in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation (B31). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Lutz van Son games or Christoph Dahmen games? This Lutz van Son vs Christoph Dahmen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Lutz van Son vs Christoph Dahmen?
Lutz van Son vs Christoph Dahmen (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Lutz van Son.
What opening was played in Lutz van Son vs Christoph Dahmen?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation (ECO B31).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Lutz van Son vs Christoph Dahmen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.