Philip van Scheltinga vs Johan Salomon
2014 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation, English Attack (B48).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Philip van Scheltinga vs Johan Salomon with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Philip van Scheltinga (1799)
- Black
- Johan Salomon (2317)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation, English Attack (B48)
About this chess game
This chess game between Philip van Scheltinga (1799) and Johan Salomon (2317) was played in 2014 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation, English Attack (B48). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Philip van Scheltinga games or Johan Salomon games? This Philip van Scheltinga vs Johan Salomon encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation, English Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Philip van Scheltinga vs Johan Salomon?
Philip van Scheltinga vs Johan Salomon (2014) finished 0–1, a win for Johan Salomon.
What opening was played in Philip van Scheltinga vs Johan Salomon?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation, English Attack (ECO B48).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Philip van Scheltinga vs Johan Salomon, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.