Luuk Van Rijn vs Walter Breukers
NED Ch U16 Open, 2000 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Three Knights System (A27).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Luuk Van Rijn vs Walter Breukers with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Luuk Van Rijn
- Black
- Walter Breukers
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- NED Ch U16 Open
- Year
- 2000
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Three Knights System (A27)
About this chess game
This chess game between Luuk Van Rijn and Walter Breukers was played at NED Ch U16 Open in 2000 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Three Knights System (A27). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Luuk Van Rijn games or Walter Breukers games? This Luuk Van Rijn vs Walter Breukers encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Three Knights System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Luuk Van Rijn vs Walter Breukers?
Luuk Van Rijn vs Walter Breukers (2000) finished 1–0, a win for Luuk Van Rijn.
What opening was played in Luuk Van Rijn vs Walter Breukers?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Three Knights System (ECO A27).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Luuk Van Rijn vs Walter Breukers, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.