Alex Van Osmael vs Werner Haeusler
EM/CL/Q03-1, 2002 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation (A34).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alex Van Osmael vs Werner Haeusler with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alex Van Osmael (2451)
- Black
- Werner Haeusler (2102)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- EM/CL/Q03-1
- Year
- 2002
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation (A34)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alex Van Osmael (2451) and Werner Haeusler (2102) was played at EM/CL/Q03-1 in 2002 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation (A34). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alex Van Osmael games or Werner Haeusler games? This Alex Van Osmael vs Werner Haeusler encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alex Van Osmael vs Werner Haeusler?
Alex Van Osmael vs Werner Haeusler (2002) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Alex Van Osmael vs Werner Haeusler?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation (ECO A34).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alex Van Osmael vs Werner Haeusler, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.