Dimitri Van Leent vs Jan Verbiest
PRO/2020/H (NED), 2019 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack (B81).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Dimitri Van Leent vs Jan Verbiest with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Dimitri Van Leent (2207)
- Black
- Jan Verbiest (1728)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- PRO/2020/H (NED)
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack (B81)
About this chess game
This chess game between Dimitri Van Leent (2207) and Jan Verbiest (1728) was played at PRO/2020/H (NED) in 2019 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack (B81). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Dimitri Van Leent games or Jan Verbiest games? This Dimitri Van Leent vs Jan Verbiest encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Dimitri Van Leent vs Jan Verbiest?
Dimitri Van Leent vs Jan Verbiest (2019) finished 1–0, a win for Dimitri Van Leent.
What opening was played in Dimitri Van Leent vs Jan Verbiest?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack (ECO B81).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Dimitri Van Leent vs Jan Verbiest, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.