David Van Kerkhof vs Henk Van der Poel
Dutch League 2015-16, 2016 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (B47).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay David Van Kerkhof vs Henk Van der Poel with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- David Van Kerkhof (2311)
- Black
- Henk Van der Poel (2210)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Dutch League 2015-16
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (B47)
About this chess game
This chess game between David Van Kerkhof (2311) and Henk Van der Poel (2210) was played at Dutch League 2015-16 in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (B47). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more David Van Kerkhof games or Henk Van der Poel games? This David Van Kerkhof vs Henk Van der Poel encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won David Van Kerkhof vs Henk Van der Poel?
David Van Kerkhof vs Henk Van der Poel (2016) finished 1–0, a win for David Van Kerkhof.
What opening was played in David Van Kerkhof vs Henk Van der Poel?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (ECO B47).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of David Van Kerkhof vs Henk Van der Poel, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.