Guy Van Habberney vs Peter Schmalz
WS/SIM/B/15, 2020 · Result ½–½ · Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation (B11).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Guy Van Habberney vs Peter Schmalz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Guy Van Habberney (1686)
- Black
- Peter Schmalz (1719)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- WS/SIM/B/15
- Year
- 2020
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation (B11)
About this chess game
This chess game between Guy Van Habberney (1686) and Peter Schmalz (1719) was played at WS/SIM/B/15 in 2020 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation (B11). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Guy Van Habberney games or Peter Schmalz games? This Guy Van Habberney vs Peter Schmalz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Guy Van Habberney vs Peter Schmalz?
Guy Van Habberney vs Peter Schmalz (2020) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Guy Van Habberney vs Peter Schmalz?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation (ECO B11).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Guy Van Habberney vs Peter Schmalz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.