Ben Van Geffen vs Niek Oud
2016 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation, Early Deviations (B66).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ben Van Geffen vs Niek Oud with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ben Van Geffen (2104)
- Black
- Niek Oud (1927)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation, Early Deviations (B66)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ben Van Geffen (2104) and Niek Oud (1927) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation, Early Deviations (B66). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ben Van Geffen games or Niek Oud games? This Ben Van Geffen vs Niek Oud encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation, Early Deviations.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ben Van Geffen vs Niek Oud?
Ben Van Geffen vs Niek Oud (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Ben Van Geffen vs Niek Oud?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation, Early Deviations (ECO B66).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ben Van Geffen vs Niek Oud, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.