Jorden Van Foreest vs Rauf Mamedov
9. Gashimov Mem Rapid, 2023 · Result 0–1 · Slav Defense: Exchange Variation, Symmetrical Line (D14).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jorden Van Foreest vs Rauf Mamedov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jorden Van Foreest (2679)
- Black
- Rauf Mamedov (2651)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 9. Gashimov Mem Rapid
- Year
- 2023
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Exchange Variation, Symmetrical Line (D14)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jorden Van Foreest (2679) and Rauf Mamedov (2651) was played at 9. Gashimov Mem Rapid in 2023 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Slav Defense: Exchange Variation, Symmetrical Line (D14). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jorden Van Foreest games or Rauf Mamedov games? This Jorden Van Foreest vs Rauf Mamedov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Exchange Variation, Symmetrical Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jorden Van Foreest vs Rauf Mamedov?
Jorden Van Foreest vs Rauf Mamedov (2023) finished 0–1, a win for Rauf Mamedov.
What opening was played in Jorden Van Foreest vs Rauf Mamedov?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Exchange Variation, Symmetrical Line (ECO D14).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jorden Van Foreest vs Rauf Mamedov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.