David Van Eekhout vs Hein Piet Van der Spek
Utrecht Open I, 2000 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation (B42).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay David Van Eekhout vs Hein Piet Van der Spek with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- David Van Eekhout (2156)
- Black
- Hein Piet Van der Spek (2254)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Utrecht Open I
- Year
- 2000
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation (B42)
About this chess game
This chess game between David Van Eekhout (2156) and Hein Piet Van der Spek (2254) was played at Utrecht Open I in 2000 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation (B42). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more David Van Eekhout games or Hein Piet Van der Spek games? This David Van Eekhout vs Hein Piet Van der Spek encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won David Van Eekhout vs Hein Piet Van der Spek?
David Van Eekhout vs Hein Piet Van der Spek (2000) finished 0–1, a win for Hein Piet Van der Spek.
What opening was played in David Van Eekhout vs Hein Piet Van der Spek?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation (ECO B42).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of David Van Eekhout vs Hein Piet Van der Spek, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.