John T.H. Van der Wiel vs Zlatko Lisjak
1975 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Amsterdam Variation (B93).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay John T.H. Van der Wiel vs Zlatko Lisjak with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- John T.H. Van der Wiel (2465)
- Black
- Zlatko Lisjak (2215)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 1975
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Amsterdam Variation (B93)
About this chess game
This chess game between John T.H. Van der Wiel (2465) and Zlatko Lisjak (2215) was played in 1975 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Amsterdam Variation (B93). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more John T.H. Van der Wiel games or Zlatko Lisjak games? This John T.H. Van der Wiel vs Zlatko Lisjak encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Amsterdam Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won John T.H. Van der Wiel vs Zlatko Lisjak?
John T.H. Van der Wiel vs Zlatko Lisjak (1975) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in John T.H. Van der Wiel vs Zlatko Lisjak?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Amsterdam Variation (ECO B93).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of John T.H. Van der Wiel vs Zlatko Lisjak, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.