Charles Van Der Westhuizen vs Mark C Campbell
2010 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation (E15).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Charles Van Der Westhuizen vs Mark C Campbell with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Charles Van Der Westhuizen (1858)
- Black
- Mark C Campbell (1986)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Queen's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation (E15)
About this chess game
This chess game between Charles Van Der Westhuizen (1858) and Mark C Campbell (1986) was played in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation (E15). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Charles Van Der Westhuizen games or Mark C Campbell games? This Charles Van Der Westhuizen vs Mark C Campbell encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Charles Van Der Westhuizen vs Mark C Campbell?
Charles Van Der Westhuizen vs Mark C Campbell (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Charles Van Der Westhuizen vs Mark C Campbell?
The game opened with the Queen's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation (ECO E15).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Charles Van Der Westhuizen vs Mark C Campbell, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.