Mark Van der Werf vs Twan Burg
2008 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Classical System, Benko Attack (E99).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mark Van der Werf vs Twan Burg with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mark Van der Werf (2404)
- Black
- Twan Burg (2342)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Classical System, Benko Attack (E99)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mark Van der Werf (2404) and Twan Burg (2342) was played in 2008 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Classical System, Benko Attack (E99). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mark Van der Werf games or Twan Burg games? This Mark Van der Werf vs Twan Burg encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Classical System, Benko Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mark Van der Werf vs Twan Burg?
Mark Van der Werf vs Twan Burg (2008) finished 1–0, a win for Mark Van der Werf.
What opening was played in Mark Van der Werf vs Twan Burg?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Classical System, Benko Attack (ECO E99).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mark Van der Werf vs Twan Burg, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.