Jannes Van der Wal vs Martin Gunnas
Stockholm Open, date unknown · Result 1–0 · French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System, Main Line (C09).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jannes Van der Wal vs Martin Gunnas with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jannes Van der Wal
- Black
- Martin Gunnas (1927)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Stockholm Open
- Opening
- French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System, Main Line (C09)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jannes Van der Wal and Martin Gunnas (1927) was played at Stockholm Open and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System, Main Line (C09). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jannes Van der Wal games or Martin Gunnas games? This Jannes Van der Wal vs Martin Gunnas encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jannes Van der Wal vs Martin Gunnas?
Jannes Van der Wal vs Martin Gunnas finished 1–0, a win for Jannes Van der Wal.
What opening was played in Jannes Van der Wal vs Martin Gunnas?
The game opened with the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System, Main Line (ECO C09).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jannes Van der Wal vs Martin Gunnas, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.