Ronald Van der Veen vs Matias Lappalainen
It Open Heart Of Finland, date unknown · Result 1–0 · Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation (D15).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ronald Van der Veen vs Matias Lappalainen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ronald Van der Veen (2021)
- Black
- Matias Lappalainen (1828)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- It Open Heart Of Finland
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation (D15)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ronald Van der Veen (2021) and Matias Lappalainen (1828) was played at It Open Heart Of Finland and finished 1–0. The opening was the Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation (D15). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ronald Van der Veen games or Matias Lappalainen games? This Ronald Van der Veen vs Matias Lappalainen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ronald Van der Veen vs Matias Lappalainen?
Ronald Van der Veen vs Matias Lappalainen finished 1–0, a win for Ronald Van der Veen.
What opening was played in Ronald Van der Veen vs Matias Lappalainen?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation (ECO D15).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ronald Van der Veen vs Matias Lappalainen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.