Niklas van der Valk vs Oleg Korneev
13. Schachtuerken Cup, 2016 · Result ½–½ · Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Niklas van der Valk vs Oleg Korneev with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Niklas van der Valk (2131)
- Black
- Oleg Korneev (2590)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 13. Schachtuerken Cup
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12)
About this chess game
This chess game between Niklas van der Valk (2131) and Oleg Korneev (2590) was played at 13. Schachtuerken Cup in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Niklas van der Valk games or Oleg Korneev games? This Niklas van der Valk vs Oleg Korneev encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Niklas van der Valk vs Oleg Korneev?
Niklas van der Valk vs Oleg Korneev (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Niklas van der Valk vs Oleg Korneev?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (ECO D12).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Niklas van der Valk vs Oleg Korneev, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.