Jaap Van der Tuuk vs Twan Burg
44. OKU 2017, 2017 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation (A22).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jaap Van der Tuuk vs Twan Burg with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jaap Van der Tuuk (2132)
- Black
- Twan Burg (2518)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 44. OKU 2017
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation (A22)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jaap Van der Tuuk (2132) and Twan Burg (2518) was played at 44. OKU 2017 in 2017 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation (A22). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jaap Van der Tuuk games or Twan Burg games? This Jaap Van der Tuuk vs Twan Burg encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jaap Van der Tuuk vs Twan Burg?
Jaap Van der Tuuk vs Twan Burg (2017) finished 0–1, a win for Twan Burg.
What opening was played in Jaap Van der Tuuk vs Twan Burg?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation (ECO A22).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jaap Van der Tuuk vs Twan Burg, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.