Erik Van den Doel vs Jan Rooze
122. ch-SCO 2015, 2015 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (B85).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Erik Van den Doel vs Jan Rooze with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Erik Van den Doel (2564)
- Black
- Jan Rooze (2316)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 122. ch-SCO 2015
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (B85)
About this chess game
This chess game between Erik Van den Doel (2564) and Jan Rooze (2316) was played at 122. ch-SCO 2015 in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (B85). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Erik Van den Doel games or Jan Rooze games? This Erik Van den Doel vs Jan Rooze encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Erik Van den Doel vs Jan Rooze?
Erik Van den Doel vs Jan Rooze (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Erik Van den Doel vs Jan Rooze?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (ECO B85).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Erik Van den Doel vs Jan Rooze, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.