Sjakkie Van Den Broeke vs Pedro Canizares Cuadra
CP.2006.P.00087, 2006 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Closed (B23).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Sjakkie Van Den Broeke vs Pedro Canizares Cuadra with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Sjakkie Van Den Broeke (800)
- Black
- Pedro Canizares Cuadra (1925)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- CP.2006.P.00087
- Year
- 2006
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Closed (B23)
About this chess game
This chess game between Sjakkie Van Den Broeke (800) and Pedro Canizares Cuadra (1925) was played at CP.2006.P.00087 in 2006 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Closed (B23). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Sjakkie Van Den Broeke games or Pedro Canizares Cuadra games? This Sjakkie Van Den Broeke vs Pedro Canizares Cuadra encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Closed.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Sjakkie Van Den Broeke vs Pedro Canizares Cuadra?
Sjakkie Van Den Broeke vs Pedro Canizares Cuadra (2006) finished 0–1, a win for Pedro Canizares Cuadra.
What opening was played in Sjakkie Van Den Broeke vs Pedro Canizares Cuadra?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Closed (ECO B23).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Sjakkie Van Den Broeke vs Pedro Canizares Cuadra, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.