John Van Baarle vs Hans Winkler
Alpenpokal 2009, 2009 · Result 1–0 · Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Petrosian System (D91).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay John Van Baarle vs Hans Winkler with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- John Van Baarle (2244)
- Black
- Hans Winkler (1923)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Alpenpokal 2009
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Petrosian System (D91)
About this chess game
This chess game between John Van Baarle (2244) and Hans Winkler (1923) was played at Alpenpokal 2009 in 2009 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Petrosian System (D91). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more John Van Baarle games or Hans Winkler games? This John Van Baarle vs Hans Winkler encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Petrosian System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won John Van Baarle vs Hans Winkler?
John Van Baarle vs Hans Winkler (2009) finished 1–0, a win for John Van Baarle.
What opening was played in John Van Baarle vs Hans Winkler?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Petrosian System (ECO D91).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of John Van Baarle vs Hans Winkler, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.