E. Van Akkeren vs Peter De Jong
tuininga tournooi, 1983 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation (A31).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay E. Van Akkeren vs Peter De Jong with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- E. Van Akkeren
- Black
- Peter De Jong (2017)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- tuininga tournooi
- Year
- 1983
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation (A31)
About this chess game
This chess game between E. Van Akkeren and Peter De Jong (2017) was played at tuininga tournooi in 1983 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation (A31). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more E. Van Akkeren games or Peter De Jong games? This E. Van Akkeren vs Peter De Jong encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won E. Van Akkeren vs Peter De Jong?
E. Van Akkeren vs Peter De Jong (1983) finished 0–1, a win for Peter De Jong.
What opening was played in E. Van Akkeren vs Peter De Jong?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation (ECO A31).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of E. Van Akkeren vs Peter De Jong, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.