Francisco Vallejo Pons vs Albert Bokros
32. ECC Open 2016, 2016 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Normal Variation (B45).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Francisco Vallejo Pons vs Albert Bokros with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Francisco Vallejo Pons (2716)
- Black
- Albert Bokros (2492)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 32. ECC Open 2016
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Normal Variation (B45)
About this chess game
This chess game between Francisco Vallejo Pons (2716) and Albert Bokros (2492) was played at 32. ECC Open 2016 in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Normal Variation (B45). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Francisco Vallejo Pons games or Albert Bokros games? This Francisco Vallejo Pons vs Albert Bokros encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Normal Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Francisco Vallejo Pons vs Albert Bokros?
Francisco Vallejo Pons vs Albert Bokros (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Francisco Vallejo Pons.
What opening was played in Francisco Vallejo Pons vs Albert Bokros?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Normal Variation (ECO B45).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Francisco Vallejo Pons vs Albert Bokros, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.