Luis Mario Vallejo Baca vs Marvin Diaz
date unknown · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Orthodox Variation (E85).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Luis Mario Vallejo Baca vs Marvin Diaz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Luis Mario Vallejo Baca (2020)
- Black
- Marvin Diaz (1519)
- Result
- 1–0
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Orthodox Variation (E85)
About this chess game
This chess game between Luis Mario Vallejo Baca (2020) and Marvin Diaz (1519) was played and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Orthodox Variation (E85). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Luis Mario Vallejo Baca games or Marvin Diaz games? This Luis Mario Vallejo Baca vs Marvin Diaz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Orthodox Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Luis Mario Vallejo Baca vs Marvin Diaz?
Luis Mario Vallejo Baca vs Marvin Diaz finished 1–0, a win for Luis Mario Vallejo Baca.
What opening was played in Luis Mario Vallejo Baca vs Marvin Diaz?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Orthodox Variation (ECO E85).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Luis Mario Vallejo Baca vs Marvin Diaz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.