Cesar Jose Valido Bouza vs Yosbany Olivera Medrano
Migoya, date unknown · Result 0–1 · Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted (C67).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Cesar Jose Valido Bouza vs Yosbany Olivera Medrano with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Cesar Jose Valido Bouza (2235)
- Black
- Yosbany Olivera Medrano (2060)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Migoya
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted (C67)
About this chess game
This chess game between Cesar Jose Valido Bouza (2235) and Yosbany Olivera Medrano (2060) was played at Migoya and finished 0–1. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted (C67). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Cesar Jose Valido Bouza games or Yosbany Olivera Medrano games? This Cesar Jose Valido Bouza vs Yosbany Olivera Medrano encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Cesar Jose Valido Bouza vs Yosbany Olivera Medrano?
Cesar Jose Valido Bouza vs Yosbany Olivera Medrano finished 0–1, a win for Yosbany Olivera Medrano.
What opening was played in Cesar Jose Valido Bouza vs Yosbany Olivera Medrano?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted (ECO C67).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Cesar Jose Valido Bouza vs Yosbany Olivera Medrano, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.