Vaidotas Valantiejus vs Vaidas Setkauskas
2010 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack (B76).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Vaidotas Valantiejus vs Vaidas Setkauskas with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Vaidotas Valantiejus (1982)
- Black
- Vaidas Setkauskas (2221)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack (B76)
About this chess game
This chess game between Vaidotas Valantiejus (1982) and Vaidas Setkauskas (2221) was played in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack (B76). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Vaidotas Valantiejus games or Vaidas Setkauskas games? This Vaidotas Valantiejus vs Vaidas Setkauskas encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Vaidotas Valantiejus vs Vaidas Setkauskas?
Vaidotas Valantiejus vs Vaidas Setkauskas (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Vaidas Setkauskas.
What opening was played in Vaidotas Valantiejus vs Vaidas Setkauskas?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack (ECO B76).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Vaidotas Valantiejus vs Vaidas Setkauskas, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.