Paulius Vaitkevicius vs Aiste Pilipaviciute
2014 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Paulius Vaitkevicius vs Aiste Pilipaviciute with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Paulius Vaitkevicius (1852)
- Black
- Aiste Pilipaviciute (1524)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84)
About this chess game
This chess game between Paulius Vaitkevicius (1852) and Aiste Pilipaviciute (1524) was played in 2014 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Paulius Vaitkevicius games or Aiste Pilipaviciute games? This Paulius Vaitkevicius vs Aiste Pilipaviciute encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Paulius Vaitkevicius vs Aiste Pilipaviciute?
Paulius Vaitkevicius vs Aiste Pilipaviciute (2014) finished 1–0, a win for Paulius Vaitkevicius.
What opening was played in Paulius Vaitkevicius vs Aiste Pilipaviciute?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (ECO B84).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Paulius Vaitkevicius vs Aiste Pilipaviciute, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.