Alexander Vaca Nunez vs Oscar Fabian Ortiz Lopez
2007 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alexander Vaca Nunez vs Oscar Fabian Ortiz Lopez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alexander Vaca Nunez (2049)
- Black
- Oscar Fabian Ortiz Lopez (1845)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2007
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alexander Vaca Nunez (2049) and Oscar Fabian Ortiz Lopez (1845) was played in 2007 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alexander Vaca Nunez games or Oscar Fabian Ortiz Lopez games? This Alexander Vaca Nunez vs Oscar Fabian Ortiz Lopez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alexander Vaca Nunez vs Oscar Fabian Ortiz Lopez?
Alexander Vaca Nunez vs Oscar Fabian Ortiz Lopez (2007) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Alexander Vaca Nunez vs Oscar Fabian Ortiz Lopez?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (ECO D02).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alexander Vaca Nunez vs Oscar Fabian Ortiz Lopez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.