Erkki Urpilainen vs Johan H.H.M. Engelen
WT/H/GT/66 ICCF, 1999 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Mikenas-Carls, Sicilian (A19).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Erkki Urpilainen vs Johan H.H.M. Engelen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Erkki Urpilainen (2164)
- Black
- Johan H.H.M. Engelen (2018)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- WT/H/GT/66 ICCF
- Year
- 1999
- Opening
- English Opening: Mikenas-Carls, Sicilian (A19)
About this chess game
This chess game between Erkki Urpilainen (2164) and Johan H.H.M. Engelen (2018) was played at WT/H/GT/66 ICCF in 1999 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Mikenas-Carls, Sicilian (A19). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Erkki Urpilainen games or Johan H.H.M. Engelen games? This Erkki Urpilainen vs Johan H.H.M. Engelen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Mikenas-Carls, Sicilian.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Erkki Urpilainen vs Johan H.H.M. Engelen?
Erkki Urpilainen vs Johan H.H.M. Engelen (1999) finished 0–1, a win for Johan H.H.M. Engelen.
What opening was played in Erkki Urpilainen vs Johan H.H.M. Engelen?
The game opened with the English Opening: Mikenas-Carls, Sicilian (ECO A19).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Erkki Urpilainen vs Johan H.H.M. Engelen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.