Julian Andres Uribe Toro vs Diego Fernando Leal Cortes
2010 · Result 0–1 · Italian Game: Classical Variation (C54).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Julian Andres Uribe Toro vs Diego Fernando Leal Cortes with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- Black
- Diego Fernando Leal Cortes (1871)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Italian Game: Classical Variation (C54)
About this chess game
This chess game between Julian Andres Uribe Toro and Diego Fernando Leal Cortes (1871) was played in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Italian Game: Classical Variation (C54). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Julian Andres Uribe Toro games or Diego Fernando Leal Cortes games? This Julian Andres Uribe Toro vs Diego Fernando Leal Cortes encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Julian Andres Uribe Toro vs Diego Fernando Leal Cortes?
Julian Andres Uribe Toro vs Diego Fernando Leal Cortes (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Diego Fernando Leal Cortes.
What opening was played in Julian Andres Uribe Toro vs Diego Fernando Leal Cortes?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Classical Variation (ECO C54).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Julian Andres Uribe Toro vs Diego Fernando Leal Cortes, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.