Mahesh Umapathysivam vs Alex Viniarski
Churchill, 2000 · Result 0–1 · French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C18).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mahesh Umapathysivam vs Alex Viniarski with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mahesh Umapathysivam (867)
- Black
- Alex Viniarski
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Churchill
- Year
- 2000
- Opening
- French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C18)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mahesh Umapathysivam (867) and Alex Viniarski was played at Churchill in 2000 and finished 0–1. The opening was the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C18). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mahesh Umapathysivam games or Alex Viniarski games? This Mahesh Umapathysivam vs Alex Viniarski encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mahesh Umapathysivam vs Alex Viniarski?
Mahesh Umapathysivam vs Alex Viniarski (2000) finished 0–1, a win for Alex Viniarski.
What opening was played in Mahesh Umapathysivam vs Alex Viniarski?
The game opened with the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (ECO C18).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mahesh Umapathysivam vs Alex Viniarski, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.