Maximiliano Uelf vs Lucas Perez Novoa
ProAm 100 Ani FADA 2022, 2022 · Result 1–0 · Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (A07).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Maximiliano Uelf vs Lucas Perez Novoa with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Maximiliano Uelf (2236)
- Black
- Lucas Perez Novoa (1734)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- ProAm 100 Ani FADA 2022
- Year
- 2022
- Opening
- Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (A07)
About this chess game
This chess game between Maximiliano Uelf (2236) and Lucas Perez Novoa (1734) was played at ProAm 100 Ani FADA 2022 in 2022 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (A07). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Maximiliano Uelf games or Lucas Perez Novoa games? This Maximiliano Uelf vs Lucas Perez Novoa encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Maximiliano Uelf vs Lucas Perez Novoa?
Maximiliano Uelf vs Lucas Perez Novoa (2022) finished 1–0, a win for Maximiliano Uelf.
What opening was played in Maximiliano Uelf vs Lucas Perez Novoa?
The game opened with the Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (ECO A07).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Maximiliano Uelf vs Lucas Perez Novoa, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.