Panagiotis Tzagarakis vs Konstantinos Betsakos
2020 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation (B60).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Panagiotis Tzagarakis vs Konstantinos Betsakos with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Panagiotis Tzagarakis (1952)
- Black
- Konstantinos Betsakos (2079)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2020
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation (B60)
About this chess game
This chess game between Panagiotis Tzagarakis (1952) and Konstantinos Betsakos (2079) was played in 2020 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation (B60). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Panagiotis Tzagarakis games or Konstantinos Betsakos games? This Panagiotis Tzagarakis vs Konstantinos Betsakos encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Panagiotis Tzagarakis vs Konstantinos Betsakos?
Panagiotis Tzagarakis vs Konstantinos Betsakos (2020) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Panagiotis Tzagarakis vs Konstantinos Betsakos?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation (ECO B60).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Panagiotis Tzagarakis vs Konstantinos Betsakos, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.