Paolo Turrini vs Rob Loose
2012 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Paolo Turrini vs Rob Loose with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Paolo Turrini (1823)
- Black
- Rob Loose (1920)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29)
About this chess game
This chess game between Paolo Turrini (1823) and Rob Loose (1920) was played in 2012 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Paolo Turrini games or Rob Loose games? This Paolo Turrini vs Rob Loose encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Paolo Turrini vs Rob Loose?
Paolo Turrini vs Rob Loose (2012) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Paolo Turrini vs Rob Loose?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (ECO A29).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Paolo Turrini vs Rob Loose, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.