Joseph David Turner vs John W Waterfield
2018 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Zagreb Variation (B91).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Joseph David Turner vs John W Waterfield with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Joseph David Turner (1860)
- Black
- John W Waterfield (1929)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Zagreb Variation (B91)
About this chess game
This chess game between Joseph David Turner (1860) and John W Waterfield (1929) was played in 2018 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Zagreb Variation (B91). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Joseph David Turner games or John W Waterfield games? This Joseph David Turner vs John W Waterfield encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Zagreb Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Joseph David Turner vs John W Waterfield?
Joseph David Turner vs John W Waterfield (2018) finished 0–1, a win for John W Waterfield.
What opening was played in Joseph David Turner vs John W Waterfield?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Zagreb Variation (ECO B91).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Joseph David Turner vs John W Waterfield, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.