Vladislav Tukhvatullin vs David Meliksetyan
2012 · Result 1–0 · Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation (C77).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Vladislav Tukhvatullin vs David Meliksetyan with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Vladislav Tukhvatullin (2298)
- Black
- David Meliksetyan (1703)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation (C77)
About this chess game
This chess game between Vladislav Tukhvatullin (2298) and David Meliksetyan (1703) was played in 2012 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation (C77). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Vladislav Tukhvatullin games or David Meliksetyan games? This Vladislav Tukhvatullin vs David Meliksetyan encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Vladislav Tukhvatullin vs David Meliksetyan?
Vladislav Tukhvatullin vs David Meliksetyan (2012) finished 1–0, a win for Vladislav Tukhvatullin.
What opening was played in Vladislav Tukhvatullin vs David Meliksetyan?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation (ECO C77).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Vladislav Tukhvatullin vs David Meliksetyan, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.