Adam Tukhaev vs Ivan Bukavshin
Aeroflot Open Rapid KO, 2013 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (B47).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Adam Tukhaev vs Ivan Bukavshin with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Adam Tukhaev (2517)
- Black
- Ivan Bukavshin (2522)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Aeroflot Open Rapid KO
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (B47)
About this chess game
This chess game between Adam Tukhaev (2517) and Ivan Bukavshin (2522) was played at Aeroflot Open Rapid KO in 2013 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (B47). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Adam Tukhaev games or Ivan Bukavshin games? This Adam Tukhaev vs Ivan Bukavshin encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Adam Tukhaev vs Ivan Bukavshin?
Adam Tukhaev vs Ivan Bukavshin (2013) finished 0–1, a win for Ivan Bukavshin.
What opening was played in Adam Tukhaev vs Ivan Bukavshin?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (ECO B47).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Adam Tukhaev vs Ivan Bukavshin, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.