Ilia2 Tsvetkov vs Stojan Emilov Ivanov
Sofia BUL, 2. Bobotsov Memorial, 2010 · Result ½–½ · Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ilia2 Tsvetkov vs Stojan Emilov Ivanov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ilia2 Tsvetkov (2389)
- Black
- Stojan Emilov Ivanov (2209)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Sofia BUL, 2. Bobotsov Memorial
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ilia2 Tsvetkov (2389) and Stojan Emilov Ivanov (2209) was played at Sofia BUL, 2. Bobotsov Memorial in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ilia2 Tsvetkov games or Stojan Emilov Ivanov games? This Ilia2 Tsvetkov vs Stojan Emilov Ivanov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ilia2 Tsvetkov vs Stojan Emilov Ivanov?
Ilia2 Tsvetkov vs Stojan Emilov Ivanov (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Ilia2 Tsvetkov vs Stojan Emilov Ivanov?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (ECO D85).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ilia2 Tsvetkov vs Stojan Emilov Ivanov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.