Richard G Truman vs Julian R Chapman
4NCL Division 3 North, 2017 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Main Line (B99).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Richard G Truman vs Julian R Chapman with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Richard G Truman (1903)
- Black
- Julian R Chapman (2117)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 4NCL Division 3 North
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Main Line (B99)
About this chess game
This chess game between Richard G Truman (1903) and Julian R Chapman (2117) was played at 4NCL Division 3 North in 2017 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Main Line (B99). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Richard G Truman games or Julian R Chapman games? This Richard G Truman vs Julian R Chapman encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Richard G Truman vs Julian R Chapman?
Richard G Truman vs Julian R Chapman (2017) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Richard G Truman vs Julian R Chapman?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Main Line (ECO B99).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Richard G Truman vs Julian R Chapman, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.