Jan Trs vs Paulo Amílcar Goene Brião
VWC9 /pr 15, 2016 · Result 1–0 · French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation (C13).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jan Trs vs Paulo Amílcar Goene Brião with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jan Trs (2164)
- Black
- Paulo Amílcar Goene Brião (1842)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- VWC9 /pr 15
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation (C13)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jan Trs (2164) and Paulo Amílcar Goene Brião (1842) was played at VWC9 /pr 15 in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation (C13). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jan Trs games or Paulo Amílcar Goene Brião games? This Jan Trs vs Paulo Amílcar Goene Brião encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jan Trs vs Paulo Amílcar Goene Brião?
Jan Trs vs Paulo Amílcar Goene Brião (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Jan Trs.
What opening was played in Jan Trs vs Paulo Amílcar Goene Brião?
The game opened with the French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation (ECO C13).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jan Trs vs Paulo Amílcar Goene Brião, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.