Tatiana Troyanok vs Oleg Bykov
Polugaevsky Mem 2014, 2014 · Result 0–1 · Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense (D78).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Tatiana Troyanok vs Oleg Bykov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Tatiana Troyanok (1581)
- Black
- Oleg Bykov (2059)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Polugaevsky Mem 2014
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense (D78)
About this chess game
This chess game between Tatiana Troyanok (1581) and Oleg Bykov (2059) was played at Polugaevsky Mem 2014 in 2014 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense (D78). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Tatiana Troyanok games or Oleg Bykov games? This Tatiana Troyanok vs Oleg Bykov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Tatiana Troyanok vs Oleg Bykov?
Tatiana Troyanok vs Oleg Bykov (2014) finished 0–1, a win for Oleg Bykov.
What opening was played in Tatiana Troyanok vs Oleg Bykov?
The game opened with the Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense (ECO D78).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Tatiana Troyanok vs Oleg Bykov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.