Ingi Tandri Traustason vs Sigurbjorn Bjornsson
2009 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ingi Tandri Traustason vs Sigurbjorn Bjornsson with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ingi Tandri Traustason (1750)
- Black
- Sigurbjorn Bjornsson (2324)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ingi Tandri Traustason (1750) and Sigurbjorn Bjornsson (2324) was played in 2009 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ingi Tandri Traustason games or Sigurbjorn Bjornsson games? This Ingi Tandri Traustason vs Sigurbjorn Bjornsson encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ingi Tandri Traustason vs Sigurbjorn Bjornsson?
Ingi Tandri Traustason vs Sigurbjorn Bjornsson (2009) finished 1–0, a win for Ingi Tandri Traustason.
What opening was played in Ingi Tandri Traustason vs Sigurbjorn Bjornsson?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (ECO E76).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ingi Tandri Traustason vs Sigurbjorn Bjornsson, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.