Rafael Torres Samper vs Jose C. Hernando Pertierra
32. Collado Villalba Op, 2015 · Result 0–1 · Modern Defense (B06).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Rafael Torres Samper vs Jose C. Hernando Pertierra with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Rafael Torres Samper (1971)
- Black
- Jose C. Hernando Pertierra (2385)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 32. Collado Villalba Op
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Modern Defense (B06)
About this chess game
This chess game between Rafael Torres Samper (1971) and Jose C. Hernando Pertierra (2385) was played at 32. Collado Villalba Op in 2015 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Modern Defense (B06). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Rafael Torres Samper games or Jose C. Hernando Pertierra games? This Rafael Torres Samper vs Jose C. Hernando Pertierra encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Modern Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Rafael Torres Samper vs Jose C. Hernando Pertierra?
Rafael Torres Samper vs Jose C. Hernando Pertierra (2015) finished 0–1, a win for Jose C. Hernando Pertierra.
What opening was played in Rafael Torres Samper vs Jose C. Hernando Pertierra?
The game opened with the Modern Defense (ECO B06).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Rafael Torres Samper vs Jose C. Hernando Pertierra, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.