Michel Torralba vs Antoine Manoeuvre
2009 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Michel Torralba vs Antoine Manoeuvre with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Michel Torralba (1973)
- Black
- Antoine Manoeuvre (2232)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94)
About this chess game
This chess game between Michel Torralba (1973) and Antoine Manoeuvre (2232) was played in 2009 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Michel Torralba games or Antoine Manoeuvre games? This Michel Torralba vs Antoine Manoeuvre encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Michel Torralba vs Antoine Manoeuvre?
Michel Torralba vs Antoine Manoeuvre (2009) finished 0–1, a win for Antoine Manoeuvre.
What opening was played in Michel Torralba vs Antoine Manoeuvre?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (ECO E94).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Michel Torralba vs Antoine Manoeuvre, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.