Miguel Angel Toro vs Esteban Alb Valderrama Quiceno
Blitz Masculino, 2024 · Result 0–1 · King's Pawn Game: Maróczy Defense (B07).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Miguel Angel Toro vs Esteban Alb Valderrama Quiceno with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Miguel Angel Toro (2049)
- Black
- Esteban Alb Valderrama Quiceno (2418)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Blitz Masculino
- Year
- 2024
- Opening
- King's Pawn Game: Maróczy Defense (B07)
About this chess game
This chess game between Miguel Angel Toro (2049) and Esteban Alb Valderrama Quiceno (2418) was played at Blitz Masculino in 2024 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Pawn Game: Maróczy Defense (B07). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Miguel Angel Toro games or Esteban Alb Valderrama Quiceno games? This Miguel Angel Toro vs Esteban Alb Valderrama Quiceno encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Pawn Game: Maróczy Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Miguel Angel Toro vs Esteban Alb Valderrama Quiceno?
Miguel Angel Toro vs Esteban Alb Valderrama Quiceno (2024) finished 0–1, a win for Esteban Alb Valderrama Quiceno.
What opening was played in Miguel Angel Toro vs Esteban Alb Valderrama Quiceno?
The game opened with the King's Pawn Game: Maróczy Defense (ECO B07).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Miguel Angel Toro vs Esteban Alb Valderrama Quiceno, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.